1. Due to dictatorship, Sheikh Hasina had to flee the country.
2. Comparing the coup in Bangladesh with Narendra Modi.
By comparison, most people are saying that this is how dictatorship ends. One day Narendra Modi may also have to run away.
PM Narendra Modi and Sheikh Hasina
"The foolishness of people can be seen in these comments.
If we consider the facts, then Khadiza Zia was winning with a majority of votes at that time, where was this crowd then? In a democracy, the most powerful weapon is the power of voting. The people of Bangladesh used this power instead of taking a violent approach. Those who are supporting this violence in India are indeed foolish, and they are waiting for another country's destruction to come.
The most important thing is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was given a shock in this election, and the people voted against him by giving him 63 fewer seats. This means that the people have put him in his place. Therefore, those who are comparing Bangladesh with India are mentally weak.
The Indian Alliance, which is trying to distance itself from
its own mistakes, like the party that got defeated, is seeking revenge by
comparing Sheikh Hasina's authoritarianism with Narendra Modi's.
History is a witness that every person who has a majority of
votes tends to become authoritarian. A person in power takes decisions that are
either in their favor or against their opponents. But this has happened in
every government. There are many examples of this in many countries. Therefore,
it is said that true welfare for the oppressed class can only be achieved when
there is a "weak but not strong government".
Comments
Post a Comment