Skip to main content

Opinion of politically minded Indians about Bangladesh

1. Due to dictatorship, Sheikh Hasina had to flee the country.

2. Comparing the coup in Bangladesh with Narendra Modi.

By comparison, most people are saying that this is how dictatorship ends. One day Narendra Modi may also have to run away.

PM Narendra Modi and Sheikh Hasina

"The foolishness of people can be seen in these comments.

If we consider the facts, then Khadiza Zia was winning with a majority of votes at that time, where was this crowd then? In a democracy, the most powerful weapon is the power of voting. The people of Bangladesh used this power instead of taking a violent approach. Those who are supporting this violence in India are indeed foolish, and they are waiting for another country's destruction to come. 

The most important thing is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was given a shock in this election, and the people voted against him by giving him 63 fewer seats. This means that the people have put him in his place. Therefore, those who are comparing Bangladesh with India are mentally weak. 

The Indian Alliance, which is trying to distance itself from its own mistakes, like the party that got defeated, is seeking revenge by comparing Sheikh Hasina's authoritarianism with Narendra Modi's.

 It means that an authoritarian figure like Sheikh Hasina, who was defeated by the people and did not even stop her authoritarianism, is considered abnormal. Therefore, it is not appropriate to compare the situation in Bangladesh with that in India.

 
History is a witness that every person who has a majority of votes tends to become authoritarian. A person in power takes decisions that are either in their favor or against their opponents. But this has happened in every government. There are many examples of this in many countries. Therefore, it is said that true welfare for the oppressed class can only be achieved when there is a "weak but not strong government".

 Will Sheikh Hasina's departure have a direct impact on India?

 Some extreme elements in India, who are affiliated with the Congress alliance, are celebrating Sheikh Hasina's departure as if it will have a direct impact on India. But what will happen instead is that a new front will open up, and the flow of refugees will increase. Hindus will be directly targeted as they come to India.


 On the other hand, Bangladesh was making rapid progress due to its cotton and jute production, surpassing India's progress. This was because Sheikh Hasina controlled the extremist forces and promoted commercial activities. Now, the Jamat-e-Islami party will have a direct impact. The party has a direct inclination towards China and Pakistan. Some ignorant Indians are celebrating this without realizing that just 6 months ago, they had publicly boycotted Indian products under Khadiza Zia's leadership. When Indian products were boycotted on a large scale, Sheikh Hasina took immediate action to stop it.

 So, who will stop it now?

 Therefore, Narendra Modi should not be making noise about something he has no control over. We should think about this instead of making merry about something that is wrong for our benefit. It is foolish to celebrate something that is wrong just because it benefits us. What is right and what is wrong will be decided by time."


 @Rashmi

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why is India not doing well in the Olympic Games?

Why isn't India performing well in the Olympics? I must correct you - India is actually performing better than expected in the Olympic Games, including the recent Tokyo 2020 Olympics. In fact, India's Olympic medal tally has been increasing steadily over the years. However, I understand your concern about India's performance in the upcoming Olympic Games, particularly Olympic 2024. Here are some possible reasons why India may not be doing as well as expected: 1. Lack of infrastructure and resources:  Many Indian athletes and sports teams lack access to world-class training facilities, coaching, and equipment. This can hinder their ability to compete at the highest level. 2. Competition from other countries:  The Olympic Games are a global competition, and many countries have invested heavily in their athletes and sports programs. India faces stiff competition from countries like China, the United States, and Japan, which have large populations, significant resources, and w...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Essence of Good Culture: Timeless Qualities that Unite Us

In today's complex and rapidly changing world, it's essential to identify the qualities that define a good culture. Culture is the foundation of a society, shaping our values, beliefs, and behaviors. In this article, we explore the timeless qualities of good culture, which transcend geographical boundaries and foster a sense of community, cooperation, and mutual respect. Culture is a complex and multifaceted concept that has been studied and debated by scholars, anthropologists, sociologists, and philosophers for centuries. At its core, culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, practices, and behaviors that are passed down from one generation to the next within a group or society. It encompasses the customs, traditions, language, art, literature, music, and other expressions that are unique to a particular group or community. Here are some key aspects of culture: Shared : Culture is shared among members of a group or society. It is a collective phenomenon th...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Paradigm-Shifting Masterpiece: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Published in 1962, "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" by Thomas Kuhn is a seminal work that has profoundly impacted the way we think about the nature of science, its development, and its relationship with society. This book is a must-read for anyone interested in the philosophy of science, the history of science, or the nature of knowledge. https://www.amazon.in/Structure-Scientific-Revolutions-50th-Anninversary/dp/0226458121 The Argument: Kuhn's central argument is that scientific progress is not a gradual, continuous process, but rather a series of revolutionary changes that occur when a new paradigm or framework replaces an existing one. A paradigm, according to Kuhn, is a set of assumptions, values, and practices that shape the way scientists think about and investigate the natural world. He contends that these paradigms are often incommensurable, meaning that they cannot be reduced to a common language or framework. Kuhn's theory is based on a historic...
Post a Comment
Read more